mosakuzii avatar

mosakuzii

Community

@mosakuzii0216

1Followers
|
2Public Repos
|
9Published Skills

mosakuzii provides OpenSpec change-management skills for spec-driven development, plus weekly progress tracking and quality-debt auditing for software projects.

Skills Distribution
DomainDeveloper To...Spec-Driven Change.. (55%)Project Progress T.. (20%)Code Quality Audit.. (15%)Requirements Explo.. (10%)

Agent Skills by mosakuzii

Showing 9 vetted skills indexed across 1 GitHub repositories.

Frequently Asked Questions About mosakuzii

FAQPage Schema
What tasks can I perform with mosakuzii's OpenSpec skills?

You can propose new changes with full design and task artifacts, explore requirements, implement change tasks, update existing planning artifacts, sync delta specs into main specs, and archive completed changes. All operations run through the openspec command-line interface.

Who are these skills designed for?

Software engineers and project maintainers practicing spec-driven development. The weekly-progress and steering skills suit developers tracking project plans in docs files, while weekly-quality-audit targets engineers repaying technical debt like missing tests and duplicated logic.

What are the prerequisites for running these skills?

The seven OpenSpec skills require the openspec CLI to be installed, as they invoke Bash(openspec:*) commands. The weekly-progress, weekly-quality-audit, and steering skills operate on project documentation files such as docs/progress.md, docs/project-plan-2026.md, and spec.json.

Are mosakuzii's skills open source and free to use?

Yes. All seven OpenSpec skills are released under the MIT license, permitting free use, modification, and distribution. They are authored by openspec at version 1.0. The remaining three skills carry no explicit license declaration in their manifest.

How does the weekly quality audit skill work?

It audits one quality-debt item per week, targeting areas ESLint and tsc cannot mechanically fix: missing tests, oversized files, duplicated logic, and poor comments or naming. Findings are repaid in safe, isolated units to keep changes reviewable.