03-庭审交锋

Automate evidentiary analysis, trial preparation, and post-trial documentation for civil litigation.

4|5|Updated Apr 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LyronLee/Civil-and-commercial-litigation-lawyer.md --skill 03
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: 03-庭审交锋
Source: https://github.com/LyronLee/Civil-and-commercial-litigation-lawyer.md/tree/main/03-%E5%BA%AD%E5%AE%A1%E4%BA%A4%E9%94%8B
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LyronLee/Civil-and-commercial-litigation-lawyer.md --skill 03

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

本阶段将民事诉讼的庭审准备工作从质证、开庭提纲到庭审纪要实现自动化协作,帮助团队在收到对方答辩状及证据材料后高效完成内部分析与文书产出。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 质证意见生成:基于对方证据逐项分析其真实性、合法性、关联性与证明力,并给出策略性评价。
  • 开庭提纲与辩论点:内部使用的逐步提纲,包含发问设计、争议焦点与突发情况预案。
  • 庭审纪要整理:庭后即时整理程序事项、调查要点、辩论要点与法官要求,形成闭环文档。
  • 阶段引用与卷宗引用:通过阶段二的卷宗路径进行引用,避免冗余与重复搬运。 该阶段在阶段三前后均可触发,确保信息在内部流转的连贯性。

Quick Start

让 AI 读取阶段二卷宗材料并生成第一份质证意见草案。

Frequently Asked Questions about 03-庭审交锋

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate evidence analysis and trial preparation for civil litigation?

Automate civil litigation evidence analysis and trial preparation by processing opposing defenses to generate cross-examination opinions, trial outlines, and court minutes. The workflow coordinates internal pretrial analysis with court-facing outputs using relative-path dossier references to avoid redundant file handling.

What is the best way to generate cross-examination opinions for opposing party evidence?

Generate cross-examination opinions by analyzing each piece of opposing evidence individually for authenticity, legality, relevance, and probative force. The process outputs strategic evaluations and coordinates with stage two dossier materials to produce structured pretrial work separated from court submissions.

How do I prepare a trial outline with debate points and questioning design?

Prepare a trial outline with an internal step-by-step structure that includes questioning design, dispute focus points, and contingency plans for unexpected situations. The outline is generated as an internal pretrial work product, strictly separated from materials designated for court submission.

Can I use relative-path dossier references for trial preparation without redundant file transfers?

Use relative-path dossier references to link stage two materials directly during trial preparation, avoiding redundant file transfers. This approach maintains strict separation between internal pretrial analysis and court-facing outputs while ensuring information flows coherently throughout the litigation workflow.

How do I organize court minutes after a civil litigation hearing?

Organize court minutes by structuring post-trial documentation into procedural matters, investigation points, debate points, and judge requirements. This creates a closed-loop document generated immediately after the court appearance, coordinating with prior pretrial materials for continuous internal workflow tracking.

When do I need to separate internal pretrial work from court submission materials?

Separate internal pretrial work from court submission materials whenever coordinating civil litigation trial preparation and post-trial documentation. This strict separation ensures internal analysis like cross-examination strategies and contingency plans remain distinct from formal evidentiary outputs intended for the court.