10x-impl-review

Review implementation against plan for drift, safety issues, and pattern compliance.

Updated May 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Oskarovsky/Sprinter --skill 10x-impl-review-oskarovsky
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: 10x-impl-review
Source: https://github.com/Oskarovsky/Sprinter/tree/main/.cursor/skills/10x-impl-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Oskarovsky/Sprinter --skill 10x-impl-review-oskarovsky

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? After implementing a plan, code often drifts from the original intent, introduces security or reliability risks, or breaks existing conventions. This Skill compares actual implementation work against the plan to catch drift, dangerous decisions, and pattern misuse before they compound. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Plan Drift Detection: Uses parallel sub-agents to verify each planned change matches the actual code, flagging missing, drifted, or unplanned changes. - Safety & Quality Scan: Checks changed files for security, performance, reliability, and data-safety issues, plus consistency with existing codebase patterns. - Structured Report & Interactive Triage: Produces a severity-ranked findings report with dimension verdicts (APPROVED / NEEDS ATTENTION / REJECTED), then walks each finding through an interactive fix/skip/record-as-lesson triage loop. - Use Case: After finishing phase 3 of a multi-phase feature plan, run a phase-scoped review to confirm the implementation matches the plan, automated success criteria pass, and no unplanned endpoints were added. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to review the implementation of the current change against its plan, for example by running the review on a specific phase or saved report path.

Frequently Asked Questions about 10x-impl-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review code implementation against a plan?

Provide the change ID or plan path, and the review loads the plan, detects what actually changed via git, and compares planned changes against the real code. Findings are reported with severity, impact, and fix options, then triaged interactively.

How to review only one phase of a multi-phase plan?

Pass a phase number such as "phase 3" as the argument. The review scopes itself to that phase's planned changes and success criteria while still checking whether its changes broke assumptions from earlier phases.

Can I resume a saved implementation review later?

Yes. Saved reports contain an IMPL-REVIEW-REPORT marker and PENDING decision fields. Passing the saved report path skips analysis and jumps directly into triage of the remaining undecided findings.

What kinds of issues does an implementation review catch?

It catches plan drift, unplanned scope additions, missing implementations, security risks like injection or hardcoded secrets, performance problems like N+1 queries, missing error handling, and inconsistencies with existing codebase patterns.

When should I not run an implementation review?

Reviews are refused for archived changes under context/archive, since reports are not appended to archived plans. It is also a review-only tool by default, so code edits happen only when you explicitly choose a fix during triage.