10x-impl-review

Review software implementations against specified plans to detect deviations.

Updated May 26, 2026

Search Tags:#quality assurance #code analysis #implementation tracking #software review #devOps

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/ValueMedia/10xcards-td --skill 10x-impl-review-valuemedia

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: 10x-impl-review
Source: https://github.com/ValueMedia/10xcards-td/tree/main/.opencode/skills/10x-impl-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ValueMedia/10xcards-td --skill 10x-impl-review-valuemedia

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps software teams detect deviations from the original plan during implementation, ensuring quality and adherence to best practices.

Core Features & Use Cases

Implementation Review: Compare actual code against planned specifications to identify drift, dangerous decisions, and pattern misuse.
Phase Review: Conduct a focused review after each phase to catch issues early.
Full Plan Review: Perform a comprehensive sweep after all phases to ensure complete adherence to the plan.
Automated and Manual Reviews: Use automated checks for efficiency and manual review for nuanced analysis.

Quick Start

Run /10x-impl-review to initiate the implementation review process.

Frequently Asked Questions about 10x-impl-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review software implementation against plan specifications to detect drift?▼

Implementation review detects deviations in scope, safety, and quality by comparing actual code changes against specified design plans. Automated checks handle efficiency while manual review provides nuanced analysis of dangerous decisions and pattern misuse.

When do I need an implementation tracking review in my software development cycle?▼

Implementation tracking reviews are needed after completing each development phase to catch issues early, and as a comprehensive sweep after all phases to ensure complete adherence to design specifications and quality standards.

Can I use automated code analysis to check for pattern misuse during a phase review?▼

Yes, automated code analysis checks can be used during phase reviews for efficiency, combined with manual review for nuanced analysis. This approach detects dangerous decisions and pattern misuse by comparing implementations against planned specifications.

What is the best way to conduct a full plan review for software quality assurance?▼

The best way to conduct a full plan review for software quality assurance is performing a comprehensive sweep across all completed phases, comparing code changes against design plans to ensure complete adherence and detect any accumulated scope drift.

Does implementation review work without dependencies or external DevOps tools?▼

Implementation review can function without external dependencies or DevOps tools, relying on scripts and references to analyze code changes against plan specifications. It operates independently to detect deviations in scope, safety, and quality.

Why does software implementation drift from the original architecture plan during development?▼

Software implementation drifts from architecture plans when developers make decisions during coding that deviate from specified scope, safety standards, or quality patterns. Reviews detect these deviations by comparing actual code changes against original design specifications.