10x-plan-review

To review an implementation plan for architectural integrity, you can use a plan review process that analyzes depth, validates paths against the codebase, and performs interactive triage on findings to ensure feasibility.

Codebase grounding in plan review is the process of validating plan paths, symbols, and consistency against the actual codebase to verify that the proposed implementation is feasible and aligned with the existing architecture.

Yes, you can review an implementation plan using a change ID, as input resolution supports handling direct file paths, change IDs, and quick document-only modes to initiate the analysis.

The best way to identify blind spots in an implementation plan is through substance analysis, which evaluates end-state alignment, lean execution, architectural fitness, and completeness to surface hidden issues.

You validate implementation feasibility before coding by running an expert review that checks plan depth, performs codebase verification of symbols and paths, and uses interactive triage for decision-making on findings.

You should not use automated plan review when your implementation plan lacks specific paths or symbols for codebase grounding, as the tool requires these details to verify architectural fitness and validate feasibility.