15-fraud

Analyze fraud narratives and map facts to Thai Penal Code articles 341–343.

1|Updated Apr 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/charoensakn/bluescope --skill 15-fraud
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: 15-fraud
Source: https://github.com/charoensakn/bluescope/tree/main/packages/skills/src/15-fraud
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/charoensakn/bluescope --skill 15-fraud

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Provides structured analytical support to investigators who must turn raw case narratives of alleged fraud into actionable investigative plans by identifying missing facts, relevant legal elements, and prioritized evidence to collect.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Fact analysis & gap identification: Extracts key facts from narratives and highlights contradictions or missing information investigators should probe further.
  • Targeted interview guides: Produces recommended question sets tailored for victims, suspects (confession or denial scenarios), and witnesses.
  • Evidence checklist & prioritization: Lists documentary, transactional, and communication evidence to obtain and explains which items prove specific elements of the offense.
  • Legal element mapping: Maps facts to Thai Penal Code provisions (notably sections 341–343) and outlines elements that must be proved.
  • Case summary drafting: Generates a concise preliminary case summary suitable for investigative files or initial charging considerations.
  • Use case example: For a suspected investment scam where the victim transferred funds after false promises, produce a case summary, evidence list (bank transfers, communications, contracts), mapped legal elements, and interview scripts for each party.

Quick Start

Analyze the following fraud case narrative and return a concise case summary, outstanding investigative questions, recommended evidence to collect, mapped legal elements under Thai law, and suggested interview questions for the victim, suspect, and witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions about 15-fraud

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze a fraud case narrative for investigative action?

To analyze a fraud case narrative, extract key facts, identify evidentiary gaps, map them to Thai Penal Code sections 341–343, and generate prioritized evidence lists, interview guides, and preliminary case summaries for your investigation.

What evidence is needed to prove fraud under Thai Penal Code sections 341 to 343?

Proving fraud under Thai Penal Code sections 341 to 343 requires documentary, transactional, and communication evidence, such as bank transfer records and contracts, mapped directly to the specific legal elements of the offense that must be proved.

How do I prepare interview questions for fraud suspects and victims?

Prepare interview questions for fraud suspects and victims by analyzing the case narrative to generate tailored question sets, addressing specific evidentiary gaps and covering both confession and denial scenarios for suspects and witnesses.

Can I map case facts directly to Thai criminal law provisions for a case summary?

Yes, you can map extracted case facts directly to Thai criminal law provisions under Penal Code articles 341–343 to outline elements that must be proved and generate a concise preliminary case summary suitable for investigative files.

What is the best way to identify missing facts in an investment scam narrative?

The best way to identify missing facts in an investment scam narrative is to extract key details and highlight contradictions or missing information, allowing investigators to probe further gaps related to false promises and fund transfers.