65-team-performance-review

Generates data-driven performance reviews for marketing team members with KPI scorecards and development plans.

569|224|Updated Apr 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills --skill 65-team-performance-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: 65-team-performance-review
Source: https://github.com/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/tree/main/skills/vi/65-team-performance-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills --skill 65-team-performance-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluating marketing team members fairly is hard when feedback is subjective, inconsistent across roles, or disconnected from actual KPI data. This Skill structures the entire review process so every judgment is backed by evidence and ends with an actionable development plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Role-specific KPI scorecards: Predefined quantitative and qualitative KPIs for content writers, designers, media buyers, and channel operators, comparing targets against actual results.
  • Structured review document: Produces a complete Markdown review covering strengths with real examples, areas for improvement, a 30/90-day development plan, a 1-5 rating rubric, and next steps.
  • 1:1 meeting format: Includes a 60-minute agenda for the review conversation, plus principles like no-surprise feedback and behavior-based (not personality-based) evaluation.
  • Use Case: A marketing lead needs to run monthly reviews for a media buyer. The Skill pulls CPL and ROAS data against targets, documents observed behaviors with dates, and outputs a review file with a development plan and consistent rating.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to create a performance review for a specific team member by providing their role, the review period, their KPIs, and actual output data.

Frequently Asked Questions about 65-team-performance-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a data-driven performance review for a marketing team member?

Collect the member's role, review period, KPIs set at the start of the period, and concrete output data such as tasks delivered, on-time rate, and campaign results. The Skill then generates a full review document with a KPI scorecard, evidence-based feedback, and a development plan.

What KPIs should I use to review a content writer or media buyer?

Content writers are measured on output volume, on-time rate, revision count, and engagement. Media buyers are measured on CPL versus target, ROAS, campaign success rate, and optimization cadence. The Skill provides role-specific KPI tables for writers, designers, media buyers, and channel operators.

Can I use this if no KPIs were set at the start of the period?

Yes, but the review will be qualitative only, and the Skill explicitly notes this limitation in the output. The first action after such a review is to define KPIs for the next period so future evaluations have a fair baseline.

When should I use a campaign retrospective instead of a performance review?

Use a campaign retrospective when evaluating a campaign or system outcome, and a performance review when evaluating an individual person. The Skill explicitly separates these two cases and links to the campaign retrospective skill for system-level analysis.

How do I avoid biased or unfair ratings in team reviews?

Apply the same rating rubric across all members in the same role, evaluate behaviors rather than personality traits, and require every judgment to include a dated example or metric. The Skill's checklist enforces these rules before the review is finalized.