What problem does it solve? Researchers preparing ML papers often struggle to decide which ablation studies reviewers will demand, wasting GPU budget on uninformative experiments or missing critical ones that trigger rejections. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Reviewer-Perspective Design: Delegates ablation design to Codex with high reasoning effort, isolating each novel component's contribution and anticipating reviewer questions. - Structured Ablation Plan: Produces prioritized tables covering component ablations, hyperparameter sensitivity, and design choice comparisons, each with expected outcomes and compute estimates. - Feasibility Review and Execution: Checks compute budget, code-change requirements, and parallelization before running, then tracks all results including negative findings in EXPERIMENT_LOG.md. - Use Case: After main results pass claim verification, generate a complete ablation plan for a paper submission, run config-only ablations first, and record insights in findings.md. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to plan ablation studies for your method by describing the method components and current experiment results.