ablation-planner

Designs prioritized ablation study plans for ML paper submissions using reviewer-perspective reasoning.

Updated Jul 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL --skill ablation-planner-lingjie-wang
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ablation-planner
Source: https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL/tree/main/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/ablation-planner
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL --skill ablation-planner-lingjie-wang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Researchers preparing ML papers often struggle to decide which ablation studies reviewers will demand, wasting GPU budget on uninformative experiments or missing critical ones that trigger rejections. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Reviewer-Perspective Design: Delegates ablation design to Codex with high reasoning effort, isolating each novel component's contribution and anticipating reviewer questions. - Structured Ablation Plan: Produces prioritized tables covering component ablations, hyperparameter sensitivity, and design choice comparisons, each with expected outcomes and compute estimates. - Feasibility Review and Execution: Checks compute budget, code-change requirements, and parallelization before running, then tracks all results including negative findings in EXPERIMENT_LOG.md. - Use Case: After main results pass claim verification, generate a complete ablation plan for a paper submission, run config-only ablations first, and record insights in findings.md. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to plan ablation studies for your method by describing the method components and current experiment results.

Frequently Asked Questions about ablation-planner

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design ablation studies for an ML paper?

Ablation design starts by listing each removable or replaceable method component, then defining what each removal tests and the expected outcome if the component matters. This skill uses Codex to generate a prioritized plan covering component ablations, hyperparameter sensitivity, and design choice comparisons.

What ablations do reviewers expect in machine learning papers?

Reviewers typically expect ablations isolating each novel component's contribution, sensitivity tests for key hyperparameters, and comparisons against natural alternative design choices. The plan also identifies unnecessary ablations that would not add insight.

When should I run ablation planning in the research workflow?

Run ablation planning after main results pass result-to-claim verification with claim_supported equal to yes or partial, or when a review loop identifies missing ablations. Planning before claim verification risks designing experiments for unsupported claims.

How are ablation experiments prioritized when compute is limited?

Component ablations take priority over hyperparameter sweeps, and config-only changes run before code modifications. If total estimated GPU-hours exceed budget, lower-priority ablations are proposed for cuts and re-prioritized rather than silently dropped.

What are the limitations of automated ablation planning?

The plan quality depends on accurate method descriptions and current experiment results being available in project files. It does not generate ablations for components identical to the baseline, and feasibility still requires manual compute budget confirmation.