academic-deep-research

To conduct a reproducible literature review, use a mandated multi-cycle workflow with explicit checkpoints between tool uses. This ensures methodology visibility, source verification, and traceability from planning to final reporting.

The best way to structure multi-source synthesis is applying a mandated two-cycle research process per theme. This surfaces evolving understanding and contradictions through explicit analysis phases before generating APA-style citations.

Yes, you can generate APA-style citations and apply evidence hierarchies by running structured narrative workflows. The process mandates traceable references and on-demand scripts throughout the exhaustive investigation phases.

Yes, this deep research workflow supports competitive intelligence and regulatory analyses. It handles complex topics requiring multi-source synthesis with explicit traceability, ensuring strict phase-based methodology and reproducible results.

Start an exhaustive investigation by initiating a structured planning phase, then execute two research cycles using web_search, web_fetch, and memory_search. Explicit analysis between tool uses ensures transparent, reproducible outputs.

You should not use a mandated two-cycle research approach for simple, single-source queries lacking complex synthesis requirements. It is designed for exhaustive investigations where methodology visibility, traceability, and reproducibility are essential.