academic-integrity-geng

Scan academic papers for data fraud, image manipulation, and methodological flaws.

1|1|Updated May 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jingshouyan/academic-integrity-geng --skill academic-integrity-geng
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-integrity-geng
Source: https://github.com/jingshouyan/academic-integrity-geng/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jingshouyan/academic-integrity-geng --skill academic-integrity-geng

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manually screening academic papers for data fraud, image manipulation, methodological flaws, improper citations, and predatory journal issues is extremely time-consuming and requires specialized domain expertise. This Skill automates the entire screening process to quickly flag potential integrity risks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 5-Dimensional Integrity Scan: Systematically checks data/result authenticity, image/chart integrity, methodological rigor, citation structure, and author/journal credibility.
  • Structured Risk Rating: Classifies papers into low, medium, high, or extreme fraud risk levels with clear evidence and severity markers for each suspicious finding.
  • Use Case: Researchers can use it for pre-submission self-review, peer reviewers can use it for initial screening assistance, and academic institutions can use it to triage reported misconduct cases.

Quick Start

Use the academic-integrity-geng skill to analyze the attached academic paper for potential integrity issues and generate a detailed fraud risk report saved to your working directory.

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-integrity-geng

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check a research paper for data fraud and image manipulation?

To check a research paper for image manipulation, you can scan the document using a systematic, rule-based integrity screening process that evaluates image and chart integrity to flag suspicious findings and generate a structured risk rating without requiring specialized image analysis software.

What is the best way to identify predatory journal red flags during peer review?

Identifying predatory journal red flags involves assessing author and journal credibility alongside citation structures and methodological rigor, allowing peer reviewers to systematically triage potential academic misconduct risks before recommending publication.

How do I perform a pre-submission academic integrity self-review on my manuscript?

Performing a pre-submission academic integrity self-review requires running a 5-dimensional scan on your manuscript to evaluate data authenticity, image integrity, methodology, citations, and journal credibility, producing an actionable fraud risk report.

Can I detect methodological flaws and improper citations without specialized software?

Yes, you can detect methodological flaws and improper citations without specialized software by applying a rule-based integrity screening that systematically evaluates citation structures and methodological rigor to classify papers into structured risk levels.

Does academic misconduct investigation work for literature quality assessment?

Academic misconduct investigation works for literature quality assessment by applying systematic integrity screening to flag data fraud and predatory journal issues, providing researchers and institutions with clear evidence and severity markers for triage.