academic-paper-reviewer

Simulate a multi-perspective editorial review workflow with five reviewer personas.

4|1|Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ARAVINDAN20/Claude-Research-Paper-OS --skill academic-paper-reviewer-aravindan20
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/ARAVINDAN20/Claude-Research-Paper-OS/tree/main/.claude/skills/academic-research-skills/academic-paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ARAVINDAN20/Claude-Research-Paper-OS --skill academic-paper-reviewer-aravindan20

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates and standardizes the evaluation of research manuscripts by simulating a full editorial board with multiple reviewer personas to generate consistent, actionable feedback and a formal decision package.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dynamic reviewer persona generation: Configures an Editor-in-Chief, three peer reviewers across disciplines, and a Devil's Advocate to critique from diverse angles.
  • End-to-end editorial workflow: Runs field analysis, parallel reviews, synthesis, decision letter, and revision roadmap, with optional Socratic guided revision coaching.
  • Output artifacts: 5 reviewer reports, a consolidated Editorial Decision Letter, and a prioritized Revision Roadmap ready for authors and downstream systems.

Quick Start

Review this paper with full phase-review to generate 5 reviewer reports plus an Editorial Decision Letter and a Revision Roadmap.

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I simulate a peer review for my research manuscript?

You can simulate a peer review by running the manuscript through a multi-perspective workflow that generates five independent reviewer reports, an editorial decision letter, and a prioritized revision roadmap.

Can I get a devil's advocate critique to find weaknesses in my academic paper?

Yes, the review workflow includes a dedicated Devil's Advocate persona that critiques the manuscript from diverse, challenging angles alongside three peer reviewers and an Editor-in-Chief.

How does multi-disciplinary field analysis work for manuscript evaluation?

Multi-disciplinary field analysis dynamically examines the manuscript's research field to assign appropriate reviewer personas, ensuring the subsequent parallel reviews and synthesis are contextually accurate.

What is the best way to generate an editorial decision letter and revision roadmap?

The best way is to execute a four-phase editorial workflow that synthesizes parallel reviews into a consolidated Editorial Decision Letter and outputs a prioritized Revision Roadmap ready for author revisions.

Does the peer review simulation provide actionable feedback for paper revisions?

Yes, it provides actionable feedback through a prioritized Revision Roadmap and optional Socratic guided revision coaching, designed to help authors systematically address identified weaknesses.

Can I use this editorial workflow for manuscripts across different research fields?

Yes, the workflow dynamically analyzes the manuscript's field to configure reviewer personas, making it suitable for evaluating research papers across various multi-disciplinary domains.