What problem does it solve? Authors lack access to realistic pre-submission peer review, so methodological flaws, literature gaps, and weak arguments are only discovered after journal submission. This Skill simulates a complete journal review process with five independent reviewer personas before you submit. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Perspective Review Panel: Dynamically configures an Editor-in-Chief, three peer reviewers (methodology, domain, cross-disciplinary), and a Devil's Advocate that challenges core arguments and detects logical fallacies. - Six Operational Modes: full review, re-review (revision verification), quick assessment, methodology-focus, Socratic guided review, and calibration mode that measures reviewer FNR/FPR against a gold paper set. - Structured Editorial Output: Produces an Editorial Decision Letter with consensus analysis, disagreement arbitration, and a prioritized Revision Roadmap compatible with downstream revision workflows. - Use Case: Before submitting a manuscript, run a full review to receive five independent reports, an accept/revise/reject decision, and a checklist of required and suggested revisions with effort estimates. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review your paper by pasting the manuscript text or providing the file path.
