Verified:GitHub

academic-paper-reviewer

Simulate multi-perspective academic paper reviews with structured feedback.

4|1|Updated Mar 14, 2026

Search Tags:#academic review #devil's advocate #peer review #manuscript critique #editorial decision #research paper evaluation

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/GPTtang/skill-atlas --skill academic-paper-reviewer-gpttang

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/GPTtang/skill-atlas/tree/main/skills/research/academic-paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GPTtang/skill-atlas --skill academic-paper-reviewer-gpttang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and templates (resource) and examples (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a comprehensive, multi-perspective review of academic papers, simulating the international peer review process to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

Simulated Peer Review: Generates reviews from 5 distinct personas (EIC, 3 peer reviewers, Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise.
Multi-Perspective Analysis: Covers methodology, domain knowledge, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges.
Use Case: Upload your draft research paper and receive a full editorial decision, reviewer reports, and a prioritized revision roadmap, mimicking the journal submission process.

Quick Start

Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file]

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get a peer review for my research paper before submission?▼

To get a peer review for your research paper, you can upload your draft to receive a simulated multi-perspective academic review. The process generates detailed reports from an Editor-in-Chief and three distinct reviewer personas, providing structured feedback on originality, methodology, and argument coherence.

Can I critique my manuscript's methodology specifically?▼

Yes, you can critique your manuscript's methodology specifically by using the methodology focus mode. This mode targets methodological rigor and evidence sufficiency, providing specialized feedback from a methodology expert persona to identify weaknesses in your research design.

What is a devil's advocate review in academic paper evaluation?▼

A devil's advocate review in academic paper evaluation is a critical analysis mode that challenges your core arguments and assumptions. It simulates a skeptical reviewer to test the robustness of your evidence, ensuring your manuscript can withstand rigorous peer review scrutiny.

Does this simulated peer review work for cross-disciplinary research?▼

Yes, this simulated peer review works for cross-disciplinary research by utilizing a dedicated cross-disciplinary reviewer persona. It analyzes papers across various academic fields to evaluate literature integration and significance from multiple domain perspectives.

How do I assess the originality and significance of my draft manuscript?▼

You assess the originality and significance of your draft manuscript by requesting a quick assessment or full review. The generated editorial decision evaluates these specific criteria alongside writing quality and literature integration, providing a prioritized revision roadmap.

What is the best way to simulate a journal editorial decision for my paper?▼

The best way to simulate a journal editorial decision is to run a full review mode on your draft. This mimics the international journal submission process, yielding a complete editorial decision, detailed reviewer reports, and actionable feedback for improvement.