academic-paper-reviewer

Name: academic-paper-reviewer
Availability: InStock
Author: start

Simulates a five-seat peer review panel producing editorial decisions and revision roadmaps.

Updated Jul 5, 2026

Search Tags:#manuscript review #peer review #academic paper #editorial decision #revision roadmap #devils advocate #reviewer calibration

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace --skill academic-paper-reviewer-huaibovip

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace/tree/main/plugins/academic-research-skills/skills/academic-paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace --skill academic-paper-reviewer-huaibovip

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Authors lack access to realistic pre-submission peer review, so manuscripts reach journals with unchallenged arguments, methodology gaps, and field-norm mismatches that trigger desk rejection or major revision. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Perspective Review Panel: Runs a five-seat role-separated panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer, Methodology, Domain, Perspective, and Devil's Advocate reviewers) with dynamically configured field-specific personas, then synthesizes an Editorial Decision Letter and Revision Roadmap. - Six Operational Modes: Supports full review, re-review (verification of revisions), quick assessment, methodology-focus, Socratic guided review, and calibration mode that measures bounded decision-error profiles against adjudicated paper sets. - Use Case: Before submitting a manuscript to a journal, paste the paper and receive five independent review reports, a consolidated editorial decision, and an itemized revision roadmap; after revising, run re-review mode to verify each comment was addressed. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review this paper and paste your manuscript text or provide the file path.

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get a simulated peer review of my paper before submission?▼

Paste your manuscript or provide its file path and ask for a review. The skill identifies the paper's field, configures five reviewer personas, and returns five review reports plus an Editorial Decision Letter and Revision Roadmap.

What review modes does academic-paper-reviewer support?▼

It supports six modes: full review, re-review for verifying revisions, quick 15-minute assessment, methodology-focus, guided Socratic review, and calibration mode that measures decision-error profiles against adjudicated papers.

How do I check whether my revisions addressed reviewer comments?▼

Use re-review mode with the original roadmap, author-adjudication sidecar, revision-evidence bundle, and revised manuscript. It produces a traceability matrix, residual issues, and a new decision or deferral.

Does the simulated review modify my manuscript file?▼

No. A read-only iron rule forbids reviewers from editing the manuscript; all reports, decisions, and roadmaps are produced as separate documents. Manuscript content is treated as untrusted data that cannot alter reviewer behavior.

Are the review scores calibrated to real journal acceptance rates?▼

No. Live reviews emit NOT_CALIBRATED status; criterion judgements are evidence-anchored but have no measured error profile. The opt-in calibration mode can measure bounded FNR/FPR on a user-adjudicated target set, but profiles are not wired to live reviews.