What problem does it solve?
This Skill provides a structured, multi-perspective peer-review workflow that simulates an editorial panel (Editor-in-Chief + 3 domain reviewers + Devil's Advocate) and outputs a unified Editorial Decision Letter plus a prioritized Revision Roadmap. It enables consistent, transparent, and traceable critique of academic papers by distributing evaluation across diverse viewpoints and synthesizing recommendations.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Independent 5-reviewer panel: EIC, methodology, domain, perspective, and Devil's Advocate reports, with a single coordination layer.
- Editorial synthesis: A centralized Editorial Decision and a Revision Roadmap that translates reviewer feedback into actionable author tasks.
- Flexible modes: full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology-focus, Socratic guided revision, calibration mode.
- Integration readiness: Outputs are designed to feed directly into an academic-paper revision flow.
Quick Start
Paste a manuscript to initiate the full 5-review process; the system will produce 5 reviewer reports, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap.