academic-verify

Verify academic claims by tracing citations through publication, methodology, raw data, and replication.

Updated Aug 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AMC-JTC/gbrain-1 --skill academic-verify-amc-jtc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-verify
Source: https://github.com/AMC-JTC/gbrain-1/tree/main/plugin/skills/academic-verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AMC-JTC/gbrain-1 --skill academic-verify-amc-jtc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? When a book, article, or speaker cites a study or quotes a statistic, you often cannot tell whether the claim is real, accurately characterized, or retracted. This Skill traces the claim to its source and records a verdict so you never rely on an unverified citation again. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Claim Tracing: Follows each claim through publication, methodology, raw data availability, and independent replication using databases like Retraction Watch, PubPeer, OSF, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex. - Structured Verdicts: Classifies each claim as Verified, Partially verified, Unverifiable, Misattributed, or Retracted, with explicit evidence and caveats. - Brain Page Output: Writes the verification result as a citation-checked brain page under concepts/ so future references reuse the verified analysis. - Use Case: A policy brief claims a program reduced costs by 40% citing a Stanford study. Run this Skill to confirm the paper exists, check whether the data is public, and determine whether the citation accurately represents the findings. ## Quick Start Verify this academic claim from the book by tracing it to the original paper and checking its replication status.

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify an academic claim cited in a book or article?

Scope the exact claim, source, number, and time period, then trace it through the original publication, methodology, raw data availability, and independent replication. The result is a verdict of Verified, Partially verified, Unverifiable, Misattributed, or Retracted with cited evidence.

How to check if a study has been retracted or disputed?

Search Retraction Watch and PubPeer for the paper title or author names to find retractions, corrections, expressions of concern, and post-publication peer review. Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex provide citation context showing papers that critique the work.

What is the difference between academic-verify and perplexity-research?

academic-verify is a claim-verification workflow that routes its web lookups through perplexity-research, which handles open-ended research. Use perplexity-research directly for general topic exploration; use academic-verify when you need a verdict on a specific cited claim.

Does academic-verify work without web access?

No. It depends on perplexity-research for the actual web lookup, since the citations returned are the evidence behind each verdict. It does perform a brain-first lookup first to reuse any prior verification of the same claim.

When should a claim be marked Unverifiable instead of wrong?

Mark Unverifiable when the underlying number cannot be traced to source data, no replication exists, and no independent confirmation is available. It means the evidence is insufficient, not that the claim is false, and the verdict reflects the source rather than search effort.