academic-writing

Summarize systems conference paper best practices into actionable writing guidelines.

4|2|Updated Feb 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/drunkcoding/AgentSkillsArxiv --skill academic-writing-drunkcoding
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-writing
Source: https://github.com/drunkcoding/AgentSkillsArxiv/tree/main/skills/academic-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/drunkcoding/AgentSkillsArxiv --skill academic-writing-drunkcoding

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systems researchers spend significant effort composing and evaluating manuscripts that conform to the problem-solution-evaluation structure used by major conferences. This Skill provides a structured, practical guide that covers paper architecture, writing style, citation management, figures/tables, and venue-specific requirements to improve clarity, rigor, and reproducibility.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured guidance on standard sections (Introduction, Background/Motivation, Design, Implementation, Evaluation, Related Work, Conclusion) and recommended content.
  • Writing principles tailored to systems papers: clarity, conciseness, directness, and quantitative rigor, with detailed examples and checklists.
  • Guidance for figures, tables, and artifact preparation, including evaluation planning and reproducibility practices.
  • Tailored workflow and revision processes that align with top venues (OSDI/NSDI/SIGCOMM/MOBICOM/SOSP/FAST).

Quick Start

Outline your system's goals and draft the Design and Evaluation sections using the included workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a systems conference paper for venues like OSDI or SIGCOMM?

Structure a systems conference paper using the problem-solution-evaluation format. Standard sections include Introduction, Background, Design, Implementation, Evaluation, Related Work, and Conclusion, tailored to meet the specific requirements of target venues like OSDI and SIGCOMM.

What should be included in the evaluation section of a systems paper?

The evaluation section of a systems paper requires quantitative rigor, clear figures, and well-structured tables. It must demonstrate reproducibility through proper artifact preparation and detailed evaluation planning aligned with conference guidelines.

Can I use this guide for writing papers targeted at MOBICOM or SOSP?

Yes, this guide applies to writing papers for MOBICOM and SOSP. It provides tailored workflows, revision processes, and frontmatter conventions specifically aligned with top systems conferences including OSDI, NSDI, SIGCOMM, MOBICOM, SOSP, and FAST.

What are the best practices for managing references in systems writing?

Best practices for managing references involve adhering to frontmatter conventions and reference management standards. This ensures citations are formatted correctly and aligned with the specific requirements of major systems conferences.

How do I plan figures and tables for a systems conference manuscript?

Plan figures and tables by following actionable guidelines for systems writing. Ensure visuals provide quantitative rigor, support the problem-solution-evaluation narrative, and meet the formatting expectations of your target systems venue.