Accessibility Auditor

To audit for WCAG 2.2 compliance, evaluate interfaces against specific success criteria, classify severity, and provide remediation guidance. This process covers keyboard navigation, screen reader behavior, zoom, contrast, and motion accessibility.

Automated scans miss keyboard navigation barriers because they cannot perform manual assistive technology testing. A standards-based evaluation identifies broken focus management and custom widget failures that automated tools overlook.

Testing screen reader behavior and ARIA requires manual assistive technology evaluation of dynamic content announcements. This identifies unlabeled buttons and custom widgets failing screen reader testing, producing actionable reporting with concrete fixes.

Yes, this approach works for auditing forms and modals by evaluating user flows against WCAG criteria. It identifies inaccessible forms, broken focus management, and low-contrast text with structured reports containing severity and verification steps.

The best way to report accessibility barriers is producing structured audit reports detailing user impact, evidence, recommended fixes, and verification steps. Reports include specific WCAG criterion references and severity classifications for actionable remediation.