accessibility-review

To audit WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, the accessibility review process identifies and reports violations across course content, pages, and media, providing structured remediation guidance and evidence citations for Must Fix outcomes.

WCAG compliance identifies strict accessibility violations that must be fixed for legal standards, whereas UDL 3.0 enhancement reviews identify gaps in engagement, representation, and action/expression to improve learning experiences for diverse learners.

You can perform a Universal Design for Learning review by loading standalone course data or a project manifest, which triggers an enhancement analysis that outputs actionable Should Improve recommendations aligned with UDL 3.0 guidelines.

Yes, the accessibility audit works with an existing .idstack/project.json manifest to surface WCAG and UDL findings across modules, content types, and assessments, producing a manifest-ready output with updated timestamps.

The best way to structure accessibility remediation is through a two-tier audit that separates Must Fix WCAG violations from Should Improve UDL recommendations, providing concrete remediation steps and evidence citations for each finding.

No specific file format is required; you can describe standalone course data directly or load an existing .idstack/project.json manifest to generate a structured accessibility_review section with remediation guidance.