accessibility-review

To audit a design for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility, evaluate contrast ratios, keyboard navigation, touch target sizing, and screen reader semantics to identify issues across perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust categories.

A WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility findings report includes issue summaries, severity levels categorized as critical, major, or minor, specific WCAG criterion mapping, and actionable recommendations for resolving the identified barriers.

Check color contrast and touch targets during a design handoff by validating contrast ratios against WCAG standards and measuring touch target sizing to ensure operability for users with disabilities or assistive technology needs.

You can evaluate keyboard navigation and screen reader semantics by running an accessibility review on the linked Figma design to validate focus behavior, form labeling, and overall operability for assistive technologies.

The best way to map accessibility issues to specific WCAG criteria is to generate a structured findings report that pairs each identified perceivable or operable barrier with its corresponding WCAG 2.1 AA criterion and actionable recommendations.

Your design review fails keyboard navigation and focus behavior checks when the evaluated page lacks proper operability semantics, preventing users who rely on assistive technology from navigating interactive elements effectively.