Accessibility review

What problem does it solve? Public documents and pages often exclude users with disabilities through issues like poor contrast, missing alt text, or unlabelled form fields, and vague findings lead to endless rework cycles. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Standards-Based Checks: Verifies heading hierarchy, alternative text, contrast ratios, link text, table headers, form labels, language attributes, colour independence, and captions or transcripts for media. - Actionable Reporting: Reports each issue with the measured value and the concrete fix, such as "Contrast 3.1:1 against a 4.5:1 requirement — darken to #4A4A4A". - Exclusion-Based Prioritisation: Orders findings by who is shut out entirely, so one unlabelled form field on an application page outranks twenty decorative images missing alt text. - Use Case: A public sector team submits a draft citizen services page and receives a prioritised list of accessibility violations with exact remediation steps before publication. ## Quick Start Review the attached public document for accessibility issues and give me a prioritised report with the specific fix for each finding.