acp-code-review

Review code diffs and pull requests for quality and security issues.

29|12|Updated May 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bravekingzhang/agent-coding-playbook --skill acp-code-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: acp-code-review
Source: https://github.com/bravekingzhang/agent-coding-playbook/tree/main/skills/acp-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bravekingzhang/agent-coding-playbook --skill acp-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the review of code changes, ensuring that pull requests and diffs adhere to quality standards and best practices.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Code Review: Analyze diffs for unrelated changes, missing verification, and potential risks.
  • Use Case: When reviewing a pull request or diff for a code change, this Skill can quickly identify issues like formatting changes, missing tests, and potential security risks.

Quick Start

Use the acp-code-review skill to review the diff for the pull request 'PR-123'.

Frequently Asked Questions about acp-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for pull requests?

Automating code review for pull requests involves analyzing code diffs to ensure adherence to quality standards and best practices. It identifies unrelated changes, missing verification, and potential risks quickly.

How do I check a diff for missing tests and potential security vulnerabilities?

To check a diff for missing tests and security vulnerabilities, the review process analyzes code changes for quality and adherence to best practices. It flags missing verification and potential risks automatically.

Can I identify unrelated changes in a pull request diff?

Identifying unrelated changes in a pull request diff is possible through automated code review. The analysis flags unrelated changes, missing verification, and potential risks to maintain quality standards.

What do I need to provide to review a code diff for quality assurance?

Reviewing a code diff for quality assurance requires access to the codebase and diff information. The automated review then processes these inputs to identify missing tests and potential security vulnerabilities.

What limitations exist when automating pull request reviews?

When automating pull request reviews, a limitation is the strict dependency on having full codebase and diff access. Without this context, the review cannot accurately identify missing tests or potential security vulnerabilities.