ad-grill-me

To clarify ambiguous project requirements, you can use a structured, codebase-first interview process that challenges assumptions and captures architectural decisions. This approach analyzes existing documentation and code to define vague requests before any research or coding begins.

A codebase-first interview for software architecture decision-making is a structured process that analyzes existing code and documentation to navigate complex requirement branches. It sharpens vocabulary and ensures decisions are recorded directly within ADR workflows.

You capture architectural decisions inline during requirements gathering by integrating decision tree navigation directly with domain documentation and ADR workflows. This ensures trade-offs and assumptions are recorded as they are resolved during the interview.

You should use a structured interview to resolve decision trees when you have fuzzy tasks like making a user flow better. It forces you to define what better means, identify domain objects, and analyze existing code before writing a single line of code.

Yes, you need existing domain-specific context files and ADR workflows to ensure consistent project evolution. The interview process requires integration with these workflows to properly challenge assumptions and capture architectural decisions as they are made.

The best way to define vague requests without wasted effort is to navigate the decision tree one branch at a time. By validating existing context and code first, you resolve trade-offs and sharpen vocabulary before initiating any implementation.