What problem does it solve? Single-pass pull request reviews often miss defects because one reviewer cannot simultaneously defend the author's intent and attack the implementation. This Skill structures Azure DevOps PR review as three independent adversarial roles so claims are both defended and falsified before a merge decision is made. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three-role adversarial review: An Advocate defends author intent with evidence, a Skeptic demonstrates concrete paths that break claims, and a Judge synthesizes both into a verdict. - Azure CLI-first data fetching: Pulls PR metadata, changed files, and work items via az repos pr, using Azure DevOps MCP only for gaps like threads and file content. - Structured Judge output: Produces a verdict, merge recommendation (approve / request changes / comment only), blocking issues, non-blocking suggestions, and residual risks. - Use Case: Before merging a high-risk Azure Repos PR, request a gang review to get an independent Advocate and Skeptic analysis plus a Judge merge recommendation, all read-only by default. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to run an Advocate, Skeptic, and Judge review on Azure DevOps pull request 1234 in your organization and project.
