Coordinate six specialized agents through structured ADR review debate rounds.
npx skills add https://github.com/rjmurillo/ai-agents --skill adr-review
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: adr-review Source: https://github.com/rjmurillo/ai-agents/tree/main/.claude/skills/adr-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rjmurillo/ai-agents --skill adr-review
Multi-agent debate orchestration for Architecture Decision Records. This skill coordinates six specialized agents through structured review rounds until consensus (or up to 10 rounds).
Trigger adr-review for .claude/skills/adr-review/SKILL.md to start a multi-agent ADR cycle.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Multi-agent ADR review coordinates six specialized agents—architect, critic, independent-thinker, security, analyst, and high-level-advisor—through structured debate rounds until consensus. The process runs through Independent Review, Consolidation, Resolution, and Convergence Check phases, with debate artifacts saved for traceability.
Use orchestrated multi-agent ADR review when creating or updating architecture decisions and need conflict resolution, diverse perspectives, and documented reasoning. It's essential when security, technical trade-offs, and organizational alignment matter and formal traceability is required.
Trigger adr-review on your ADR file to start a multi-agent orchestration cycle. The process automatically coordinates agent roles through phase-based rounds, applies consensus criteria, and outputs debate artifacts to .agents/architecture/ for full lifecycle documentation.
The orchestration applies conflict resolution and scope-split guidance to maintain clarity and alignment. Agents iterate through structured rounds—up to 10 maximum—until consensus emerges or documented disagreement surfaces with rationale captured in artifacts.
Yes. The multi-agent framework includes dedicated security and analyst agents alongside architect, critic, independent-thinker, and high-level-advisor roles. All perspectives contribute through structured debate phases to ensure comprehensive decision validation.
Clean1inesCapture architectural decisions as structured ADRs with context, alternatives, and rationale.
JaimeJunrGuide structured architectural debates evaluating alternatives and documenting criteria, risks, and consensus.
raykCreate Architecture Decision Records with ADR-NNN naming and lifecycle statuses.
loriensleafsCoordinate six agents to review Architecture Decision Records and produce MADR 4.0 compliant updates.
