adr-writer

An Architectural Decision Record using the MADR format requires documenting architecture choices across structured sections including Status, Context, Decision, Rationale, Consequences, Alternatives, References, and Notes to ensure consistent software-design documentation.

The MADR structure for software-design decisions enforces specific sections: Status, Context, Decision, Rationale, Consequences, Alternatives, References, and Notes, which collectively reduce ambiguity and drift over time in modular software projects.

Architectural decision records should be numbered using a 4-digit scheme, such as 0001-adr-writing.md, and cross-linked by adding references to related ADRs within the document to maintain traceability.

You need to create an ADR for technology choices when capturing critical architectural decisions, cross-cutting concerns, or technology selections in modular software projects to prevent documentation drift and ambiguity.

The best way to automate MADR-compliant ADR creation is to use a tool that enforces the 4-digit numbering, required sections, and cross-linking of related decisions, reducing manual formatting overhead.

Yes, this ADR writing approach works for modular software projects by specifically covering decisions across architecture, technology choices, and cross-cutting concerns while enforcing consistent documentation references.