What problem does it solve? Design documents, specifications, and plans often contain unsupported claims, circular evidence, missing controls, and cross-spec inconsistencies that pass superficial review. This Skill conducts an independent adversarial review that attacks the document for material errors and produces an auditable, severity-graded findings report. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five Review Lanes: Evidence fidelity, per-component attack, cross-spec consistency matrix, currency checks against live state, and practicality/proportionality assessment. - Structured Findings Standard: Every finding carries ID, severity (Critical/Major/Minor), precise claim, file-and-line evidence, failure scenario, impact, disposition, and affected decisions. - Implementation-Conformance Mode: Reviews committed code against its accepted plan, binding every claimed control to the line that implements it. - Use Case: Before a design sign-off gate, run this Skill on a specification to catch stale citations, unenforced invariants, and untestable interfaces, then deliver a verdict of accept, accept_with_required_changes, or rework_required. ## Quick Start Use the adversarial-design-review skill to attack the attached design specification and produce a severity-graded findings report with a decision disposition.
