adversarial-document-reviewer

To catch hidden assumptions in a technical plan, you need an adversarial review process that surfaces unstated premises and mismatches between stated goals and actual requirements. This approach challenges the epistemological validity of documents before resources are committed.

Adversarial document review is a method that challenges the epistemological validity of technical documents by testing premises, surfacing unstated assumptions, and stress-testing major decisions. It eliminates confirmation bias and catches flawed decision-making early.

To stress-test major architectural decisions, you can construct falsification tests and perform reversal cost analysis. This process identifies confirmation bias and high-risk choices in proposals for new abstractions or significant architectural changes before work begins.

You should use adversarial review for technical requirements when dealing with high-stakes domains, documents with more than 5 requirements or implementation units, and proposals for new abstractions or significant architectural changes like payment processing or data migration plans.

Yes, adversarial review works effectively for compliance-focused data migration documents. It surfaces unaddressed risks and flawed decision-making by challenging premises and testing the epistemological validity of the technical plan before implementation begins.