adversarial-eval

Identify flaws in tests, prompts, reviews, and architecture through structured adversarial evaluation.

1|Updated Apr 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DigiStrique-Solutions/sentinel --skill adversarial-eval
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: adversarial-eval
Source: https://github.com/DigiStrique-Solutions/sentinel/tree/main/skills/adversarial-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DigiStrique-Solutions/sentinel --skill adversarial-eval

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarial evaluation surfaces blind spots in work products (tests, prompts, code reviews, and architecture) by enforcing independent scrutiny in a structured, multi-round workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent evaluator protocol: A different session critiques the work product to reveal biases and missed flaws.
  • Three-round max with convergence: Issues are revisited through up to three rounds, with fixes and re-evaluation only for identified items.
  • Structured issue tracking: Severity levels and a documented diff-based fix approach map each issue to a concrete change.
  • Coverage for multiple domains: Applies to test quality, prompt auditing, architecture reviews, and design documentation.
  • Convergence & governance: Tracks progress in a convergence log and escalates unresolved issues when needed.

Quick Start

Initiate a three-round adversarial evaluation on the target artifact, assign a separate evaluator to critique the work product, and save the issues to vault/evals.

Frequently Asked Questions about adversarial-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an adversarial evaluation to find flaws in my software architecture?

Adversarial evaluation identifies flaws in software architecture by assigning an independent evaluator to critique the work product. It uses a multi-agent workflow with explicit issue reporting, severity levels, and diff-based fixes to map each issue to a concrete change.

What is the best way to audit prompts for hidden biases and missed flaws?

Auditing prompts for hidden biases requires an independent evaluator protocol that critiques the work product. This structured process tracks issues through severity levels and applies targeted fixes to ensure prompt quality.

How many rounds of evaluation are needed to reach convergence on test quality assurance?

Convergence on test quality assurance is reached within a maximum of three rounds. Issues are revisited with fixes and re-evaluation only for identified items, while progress is tracked in a convergence log.

Can I use this adversarial testing approach for both code reviews and design documentation?

Yes, adversarial testing applies to code reviews, design documentation, test quality, and prompt auditing. It enforces structured issue tracking and governance across these multiple domains to surface blind spots.

How are identified issues tracked and resolved during architecture reviews?

Identified issues during architecture reviews are tracked using structured severity levels and a documented diff-based fix approach. The system maps each issue to a concrete change and escalates unresolved items when needed.