adversarial-multi-model-review

Orchestrate cross-model adversarial reviews across four phases with model switching.

Updated Mar 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/stevenengland/sten-agent-skills --skill adversarial-multi-model-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: adversarial-multi-model-review
Source: https://github.com/stevenengland/sten-agent-skills/tree/main/skills/adversarial-multi-model-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stevenengland/sten-agent-skills --skill adversarial-multi-model-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables a structured adversarial review by running parallel, cross-checking perspectives across multiple AI models to surface issues a single reviewer might miss.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four-phase adversarial review process: runs with model switching between phases for maximum adversarial value.
  • Independent, cross-perspective analysis: each model evaluates engineering, security, architecture, operations, production, and devil's advocate dimensions.
  • Artifact-driven synthesis: stores intermediate findings outside the repository and produces a final consolidated improvement list for broad use in code, plans, designs, or architecture reviews.

Quick Start

Run the skill with the artifact you want reviewed (file path, code block, plan, or design) to initiate Phase 1.

Frequently Asked Questions about adversarial-multi-model-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run an adversarial code review across multiple AI models?

To run an adversarial code review across multiple AI models, initiate the skill with your artifact to start a four-phase process that switches models between phases for independent cross-perspective analysis.

What is cross-model adversarial review and when do I need it for architecture design?

Cross-model adversarial review is a process that evaluates architecture designs by running parallel, cross-checking perspectives across multiple AI models to surface issues a single reviewer might miss.

Can I use this multi-model review process for plans and designs, not just code?

Yes, you can use this multi-model review process for plans, designs, and architectures. It evaluates engineering, security, operations, and production dimensions to produce a consolidated improvement list.

How does model switching work during the four-phase adversarial review?

Model switching works by requiring you to change AI models between Phase 1 and Phase 4, ensuring independent analyses that maximize adversarial value and surface hidden issues.

Where are intermediate findings stored during an adversarial architecture review?

Intermediate findings are stored outside the repository as artifact-driven outputs, ensuring independent analyses remain uncontaminated before final synthesis produces a consolidated improvement list.

Best way to identify missed risks in software engineering designs?

The best way to identify missed risks in software engineering designs is using a structured adversarial review that applies a devil's advocate dimension alongside engineering and security cross-perspectives.