adversarial-proposal

Multi-agent sessions coordinate isolated proposals for architecture decisions and bug fixes by enforcing strict separation between independent analysis rounds. This approach identifies root causes through multiple viewpoints before synthesizing a final actionable plan.

Adversarial proposal workflow executes independent Round A and Round B analyses, synthesizes them in Round C, and applies critiques in Round 4. This multi-proposal framework enforces strict artifact management to produce robust engineering plans with identified risks.

Generating a final plan from independent agent proposals requires a formal synthesis phase that consolidates isolated analyses into a single artifact. The output final-plan.md includes actionable steps, identified risks, and required testing protocols.

Yes, the adversarial proposal framework strictly requires an explicit problem statement before initiating isolated multi-agent analysis. This formal prerequisite ensures all independent proposals address the exact engineering challenge and produce actionable final plans.

Isolated multi-proposal analysis directly supports feature planning across independent agents by enforcing strict session separation. This ensures diverse architectural viewpoints are captured and synthesized into a comprehensive final plan with testing steps.

Limitations of this multi-agent framework include the strict requirement for isolated agent sessions and formal artifact management, which may introduce overhead for simple engineering tasks that do not require adversarial synthesis or multiple viewpoints.