adversarial-review

Identify security weaknesses in code through adversarial trust boundary and attack surface review.

13|6|Updated Apr 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/baekenough/second-brain --skill adversarial-review-baekenough
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: adversarial-review
Source: https://github.com/baekenough/second-brain/tree/main/.claude/skills/adversarial-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/baekenough/second-brain --skill adversarial-review-baekenough

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarial code review helps teams proactively identify and remediate security and reliability gaps by thinking like an attacker and enumerating threat models, attack surfaces, and defense gaps before deployment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase-based security review leveraging STRIDE + OWASP frameworks to uncover trust boundary violations, attack surfaces, and logic flaws.
  • Comprehensive defense evaluation with remediation guidance, including input validation, encoding, rate limiting, and secret management.
  • Use Case: A security-conscious software team performs regular reviews on critical modules (auth, payments, data exports) to reduce exploitable weaknesses prior to release.

Quick Start

Follow the guided review process to perform an adversarial code review on a target repository, focusing on trust boundaries and defense gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about adversarial-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial code review to identify security weaknesses?

Adversarial code review identifies security weaknesses by analyzing trust boundaries, mapping attack surfaces, reviewing business logic, and evaluating defense gaps using the STRIDE and OWASP frameworks to deliver prioritized mitigations and concrete fixes.

What is threat modeling in the context of secure code review?

Threat modeling in secure code review involves applying structured methodologies like STRIDE to proactively enumerate potential attack surfaces and defense gaps before deployment, ensuring exploitable weaknesses are remediated.

How do I find trust boundary violations and business logic flaws in my code?

To find trust boundary violations and business logic flaws, perform a phased security review that maps trust boundaries, analyzes attack surfaces, and evaluates input validation, encoding, rate limiting, and secret management.

Does this adversarial review methodology work for critical modules like authentication and payments?

Yes, this adversarial review methodology works for critical modules like authentication and payments by evaluating business logic and defense gaps to reduce exploitable weaknesses prior to release.

What is the best way to generate remediation guidance for OWASP vulnerabilities?

The best way to generate remediation guidance for OWASP vulnerabilities is through a comprehensive defense evaluation that provides actionable findings, concrete fixes, and evidence-backed risk assessments aligned with secure coding practices.

When should I use STRIDE threat modeling instead of standard code review?

Use STRIDE threat modeling instead of standard code review when you need to proactively identify security and reliability gaps by thinking like an attacker, specifically targeting trust boundaries and defense gaps before deployment.