adversarial-review

Adversarial review is a preflight validation method that analyzes a plan across six risk vectors to surface gaps, scope issues, and dependencies before execution begins. It generates severity-tiered findings and revision guidance to improve plan quality.

To run an adversarial plan review, provide your plan outline or brief to trigger the review protocol. The system analyzes it across six risk vectors and returns a structured verdict with blocking issues, important findings, and recommended revisions.

Adversarial plan review evaluates six risk vectors: assumptions, edge cases, dependencies, scope creep, quality gaps, and requirements coverage. Each vector surfaces specific findings tiered from S1 Blocking to S4 Observation to prioritize revision efforts.

Adversarial review suits product, engineering, and program-management workflows to enforce formal quality gates before implementation. It validates plans by surfacing scope issues and dependencies, improving plan quality prior to execution across these team contexts.

Adversarial plan review produces severity-tiered findings ranging from S1 Blocking to S4 Observation. Each tier prioritizes revision guidance so teams can address critical gaps and scope issues before execution begins.

Automated plan review should not replace execution-phase monitoring or post-implementation validation. It is a preflight gate for surfacing gaps and scope issues in the plan outline itself, not for verifying implementation correctness or runtime behavior.