adversarial-review

Execute a multi-stage adversarial review protocol for product planning and technical architecture validation.

100|15|Updated Nov 13, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/skillkit --skill adversarial-review-rfxlamia
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: adversarial-review
Source: https://github.com/rfxlamia/skillkit/tree/main/skills/adversarial-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/skillkit --skill adversarial-review-rfxlamia

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the common issue of superficial reviews by enforcing a structured, multi-stage protocol that uncovers hidden flaws and ensures actionable outcomes for product plans, brainstorming sessions, and technical architectures.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Reality vs. Claims Validation: Verifies assertions against real-world data through web searches.
  • Executor Capability Assessment: Stress-tests the feasibility of a plan or architecture for a specific executor.
  • Mandatory Bug Quota: Guarantees a minimum number of issues are identified, preventing shallow reviews.
  • Interactive Resolution Paths: Provides clear, categorized options (Auto-fix, Action Items, Deep Dive) for each identified issue.
  • Use Case: Before committing to a new feature, run an adversarial review to ensure the proposed technical architecture is sound, identify potential bugs, and get clear steps on how to address any issues found.

Quick Start

Run the adversarial review protocol for the attached product plan document.

Frequently Asked Questions about adversarial-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I uncover hidden bugs in my product plan before development?

Uncover hidden bugs in a product plan by running a multi-stage adversarial review protocol that enforces a minimum bug quota and categorizes issue severity, ensuring non-obvious problems are identified before commitment.

What is adversarial review for technical architecture validation?

Adversarial review for technical architecture validation is a multi-stage protocol that stress-tests executor capabilities and assesses claims against real-world data via web searches to rigorously identify potential flaws.

How do I stress-test a proposed technical architecture for feasibility?

Stress-test a proposed technical architecture by executing an adversarial review protocol that assesses claims against reality, evaluates executor capabilities, and provides interactive resolution paths like auto-fix or deep dive.

Can I get actionable resolution steps for issues found during a product review?

Get actionable resolution steps for identified issues through interactive resolution paths that categorize findings into auto-fix suggestions, specific action items, and deep dive options for thorough problem solving.

What is the best way to ensure a technical review identifies non-obvious problems?

Ensure a technical review identifies non-obvious problems by enforcing a structured protocol with a mandatory bug quota, preventing superficial reviews and guaranteeing a minimum number of issues are uncovered.

Does the adversarial review process verify product claims against real-world data?

Yes, the adversarial review process verifies product claims against real-world data by executing web searches to validate assertions, ensuring proposed plans and architectures are grounded in reality.