adversarial-review

Review plans and implementations for compliance and traceability gaps.

2|Updated Nov 12, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/stlwolf/ai-development-hub --skill adversarial-review-stlwolf
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: adversarial-review
Source: https://github.com/stlwolf/ai-development-hub/tree/main/canonical/skills/adversarial-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stlwolf/ai-development-hub --skill adversarial-review-stlwolf

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Plan/Spec quality and post-implementation compliance verification are often manual, error-prone, and slow; this Skill provides structured reviews and a template-driven approach.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Plan Review: evaluates completeness, consistency, clarity, and scope of initial plans and kickoff documents.
  • Compliance Review: independently verifies that implemented work matches described requirements and specifications.
  • Sub-agent prompt templates: includes ready-to-use prompts to inject sub-agents for parallel validation and integration checks.

Quick Start

Run adversarial-review on a Plan/Spec and post-completion result to validate plan quality and verify implementational compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions about adversarial-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify spec compliance after implementation?

Spec compliance verification independently checks implemented work against described requirements to identify and expose gaps. It applies structured reviews to ensure alignment between planned scope and delivered results for projects requiring post-implementation quality assurance.

What is the best way to review a project plan for completeness?

Plan review evaluates completeness, consistency, clarity, and scope of initial plans and kickoff documents. This template-driven approach provides structured quality assurance checks to expose gaps between a plan and its implementation, replacing manual and error-prone reviews.

Can I use sub-agents for parallel validation checks?

Yes, you can use sub-agents for parallel validation checks using ready-to-use prompt templates. These templates inject sub-agents into multi-agent workflows to perform independent verification, traceability checks, and integration checks across the delivered implementation.

Does adversarial-review work for multi-agent workflow compliance verification?

Adversarial-review works for multi-agent workflow compliance verification by handling sub-agent prompts and applying independent verification to the delivered results. It ensures traceability checks and alignment between planned scope and implemented work within these complex workflows.

When do I need independent traceability checks for software engineering?

You need independent traceability checks when a project requires strict compliance verification and alignment between planned scope and delivered results. It exposes gaps between specifications and implementations to satisfy requirements for independent verification and improve overall quality.

What are the limitations of manual post-implementation compliance review?

Manual post-implementation compliance review is often slow and error-prone, lacking structured traceability checks. A template-driven approach applies rigorous plan quality checks and independent verification to overcome these limitations and ensure alignment between specifications and delivered results.