adversarial-spec

Refine a PRD or technical spec by running multi-model debates that apply standardized prompts, surface model critiques, and iterate until consensus is achieved. Participants review feedback and apply stepwise revisions to converge on robust requirements.

Adversarial spec development simulates debates among multiple language models to generate and refine product specifications. It surfaces gaps, edge cases, and biases that a single model would miss, driving comprehensive requirements.

Yes, adversarial-spec integrates with litellm to leverage diverse CLI and Bedrock providers. This exposes diverse perspectives and robust convergence during multi-model critique rounds for your technical specifications.

Generate technical specifications via LLM debate while tracking dependencies, costs, and provenance for audit. The workflow provides deterministic outputs via standardized prompts, cost tracking, diffing, and session support.

Yes, you can export a final converged spec for handoff to product, design, or engineering teams. The export includes traceable decisions and document evolution annotated with model feedback and Claude's independent critiques.

Multi-LLM debate for spec convergence requires iterating until all participants agree, which may incur multiple rounds and associated costs. It depends on litellm integration to expose diverse perspectives from available CLI or Bedrock providers.