adversary

Execute adversarial quality reviews with C1-C4 strategy templates and S-014 rubric scoring.

30|6|Updated Feb 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/geekatron/jerry --skill adversary
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: adversary
Source: https://github.com/geekatron/jerry/tree/main/skills/adversary
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/geekatron/jerry --skill adversary

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarial quality reviews surface weaknesses and governance gaps in deliverables by applying standardized strategy templates, enabling teams to strengthen arguments, improve robustness, and align with organizational standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • On-demand adversarial critiques using canonical strategy templates
  • Strategy selection driven by deliverable criticality (C1–C4)
  • Execution of adversarial templates against deliverables with structured findings
  • 6-dimension S-014 rubric scoring (quality scoring) with persistent artifacts
  • Full tournament-style review (C4) across all strategies when needed

Quick Start

Provide a standalone adversarial review on a given deliverable by selecting strategies for its criticality, executing the templates, and scoring with S-014.

Frequently Asked Questions about adversary

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is an adversarial quality review and how does it surface deliverable weaknesses?

An adversarial quality review applies standardized strategy templates to deliverables to surface governance gaps and critical issues. It maps deliverables to criticality levels, executes templates, and scores outcomes using the S-014 rubric to improve robustness and alignment.

How do I perform a criticality-driven strategy selection for deliverable reviews?

Strategy selection is driven by mapping deliverables to criticality levels C1 through C4. You select the appropriate adversarial strategy templates based on this criticality mapping, then execute the templates against the deliverable to generate structured findings.

When do I need a full tournament-style review across all adversarial strategies?

A full tournament-style review across all strategies is required for C4 criticality deliverables. This comprehensive adversarial review applies every available strategy template to ensure maximum scrutiny on the highest-criticality items before scoring with the S-014 rubric.

How are adversarial review outcomes scored and persisted for audit?

Adversarial review outcomes are scored using the 6-dimension S-014 rubric for quality assessment. The resulting scores and structured findings are persisted as artifacts, providing a complete audit trail of the review process and deliverable weaknesses.

Can I use standardized templates for problem-solving without configuring components?

Yes, you can apply canonical adversarial strategy templates directly without configuring additional components. The review process selects strategies based on deliverable criticality, executes templates, and produces structured findings with S-014 rubric scores automatically.

What is the best way to strengthen arguments and improve deliverable robustness?

The best way to strengthen arguments is through on-demand adversarial critiques using standardized strategy templates. By mapping deliverables to criticality levels and executing templates, teams identify governance gaps and improve robustness via S-014 rubric scoring.