advisor

Critique ideas, plans, or decisions with a two-part analysis and action plan.

21|4|Updated Jan 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/JotJunior/claude-ai-tips --skill advisor-jotjunior
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: advisor
Source: https://github.com/JotJunior/claude-ai-tips/tree/main/global/skills/advisor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JotJunior/claude-ai-tips --skill advisor-jotjunior

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides brutally honest strategic critique of ideas, plans, or decisions, exposing logical gaps and biases to help users refine their approach.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Brutally honest analysis of reasoning to reveal inconsistencies.
  • Structured two-part output: Part 1 critical critique; Part 2 tactical action plan with concrete steps.
  • Useful for evaluating business proposals, project plans, and strategic decisions needing rigorous validation.
  • Example: Used to test a go-to-market plan by challenging assumptions and outlining counterpoints.

Quick Start

Provide your idea or plan and request a brutal strategic critique.

Frequently Asked Questions about advisor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get an honest critique of my business strategy to expose logical gaps?

To get an honest critique of your business strategy, submit your plan for brutally honest critical analysis. This approach reveals inconsistencies and hidden biases, providing a rigorous validation of your rationale.

What is the best way to test the assumptions in a project proposal?

The best way to test assumptions in a project proposal is through rigorous critical analysis that challenges your underlying rationale. This identifies potential flaws and provides counterpoints to refine your approach.

Can I use critical analysis to get an actionable plan for my decision-making process?

Yes, you can use critical analysis to evaluate your decision-making and generate an actionable plan. The output is structured into a tactical action plan with concrete steps and explicit evidence.

How do I evaluate a go-to-market plan without bias affecting the results?

To evaluate a go-to-market plan without bias, apply a brutally honest strategic critique that challenges assumptions and outlines counterpoints. This exposes logical gaps to ensure objective validation.

Does this strategic critique approach work for evaluating project plans at a large scale?

This strategic critique approach is applicable to evaluating project plans regardless of scale, as long as the rationale requires rigorous testing. It enforces a two-part response to validate decisions with explicit evidence.

Why does my project proposal need a two-part critical analysis and action plan?

Your project proposal needs a two-part critical analysis and action plan to ensure logical gaps are exposed and resolved with concrete steps. This structured response guarantees that critique is followed by tactical execution.