Verified:GitHub

advisory-board

Coordinate a multi-phase advisory process with 12 experts to surface risks and produce a decision map.

264|33|Updated Apr 9, 2026

Search Tags:#facilitation #decision-making #risk-analysis #multi-framework #structured-process #stakeholder-management #advisory-board

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Backtthefuture/huangshu --skill advisory-board

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: advisory-board
Source: https://github.com/Backtthefuture/huangshu/tree/main/skills/advisory-board
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Backtthefuture/huangshu --skill advisory-board

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

黄叔的私董会提供一个结构化的、以12位顶级思想家视角交锋的决策工作坊，帮助你揭示隐藏的风险与偏见，并在多框架对撞中提炼可执行的结论。

Core Features & Use Cases

结构化分阶段的决策流程，汇聚12位顾问的独特框架与判断
Phase 0~Phase 5 的全流程设计：议题捕捉、信息澄清、选席、发言、交锋与决议
产出可追溯的决策地图、风险清单与具体行动计划，便于落地执行

Quick Start

启动私董会并输入议题，由主持人带领完成从 Phase 0 到 Phase 5 的完整流程草案。

Frequently Asked Questions about advisory-board

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

What is a multi-framework advisory board process for decision-making?▼

A multi-framework advisory board process selects 5-7 advisors from a pool of 12 experts to debate an issue. It applies structured phases from issue capture to final decision, producing a decision map, risk register, and concrete next steps.

How do I facilitate structured stakeholder management and risk analysis for a critical decision?▼

You facilitate structured stakeholder management by running a multi-frame advisory process with 2-3 rounds of first-person debate. This structured process surfaces hidden risks and produces a phase-by-phase risk register and concrete next steps.

How to start a structured advisory board debate to surface hidden risks?▼

Start a structured advisory board debate by inputting your topic to trigger Phase 0. The process then moves sequentially through issue capture, information clarification, advisor selection, debate, and resolution to generate a decision map.

Can I use a structured decision-making process for complex multi-framework stakeholder management?▼

Yes, you can use this structured decision-making process for multi-framework stakeholder management. It coordinates 12 distinct expert perspectives to surface diverse viewpoints and hidden risks, producing a concrete and auditable decision map.

What are the limitations of using a multi-framework advisory board for decision-making?▼

The advisory board process limits debates to 2-3 rounds and requires selecting 5-7 advisors from the 12 available. It maintains strict safety and non-deception constraints, bounding the debate depth while ensuring an auditable decision map.