advocacy-code-review

Automates layered code-review workflows with automated checks, AI analysis, and human oversight.

4|3|Updated Feb 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Open-Paws/no-animal-violence --skill advocacy-code-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: advocacy-code-review
Source: https://github.com/Open-Paws/no-animal-violence/tree/main/.claude/skills/advocacy-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Open-Paws/no-animal-violence --skill advocacy-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates and standardizes code-review workflows to balance automation, AI-assisted analysis, and human oversight, reducing review time and increasing safety.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Layered review pipeline: automated checks, AI-assisted analysis, and human design-quality review.
  • Advocacy-aware governance: Ousterhout red flags, AI-failure pattern checks, and emphasis on emotional safety and coalition considerations.
  • Use Case: PRs involving AI-generated code or high-risk changes require multi-layer reviews to ensure safety and compliance.

Quick Start

Run the advocacy-code-review pipeline on the current pull request to perform automated checks, AI-assisted analysis, and a human design review.

Frequently Asked Questions about advocacy-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-layer validation for AI-generated code in pull requests?

Multi-layer validation for AI-generated code is automated by running a pipeline that combines automated checks, AI-assisted analysis, and human design-quality review to identify defects and policy violations.

What are Ousterhout red flags in software engineering code review?

Ousterhout red flags are design-level warning signs identified during the human oversight phase of a layered code review to ensure advocacy-aware governance and high safety standards in high-risk changes.

How do I add human-in-the-loop checks to an AI-assisted code review workflow?

Human-in-the-loop checks are integrated by establishing a layered review pipeline where AI-assisted analysis is followed by mandatory human design-quality review to catch emotional safety and coalition considerations.

Does this code review workflow support advocacy-focused projects with high-risk changes?

This code review workflow supports advocacy-focused projects by applying multi-layer validation, AI-failure pattern checks, and safety-oriented review criteria specifically tailored for high-risk changes across forks and collaborative reviews.

What is the best way to structure a safety-oriented code review pipeline?

A safety-oriented code review pipeline is structured by sequentially combining automated checks, AI-assisted analysis, and human oversight to satisfy multi-layer validation and red-flag governance requirements.

When do I need a layered code review process instead of automated checks alone?

A layered code review process is needed when handling AI-generated code or high-risk changes where automated checks alone are insufficient to identify policy violations and ensure advocacy-aware safety.