ag-revisar-codigo

Automate design-focused code review on PRs and changesets with severity-labeled markdown reports.

19|4|Updated Mar 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude --skill ag-revisar-codigo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ag-revisar-codigo
Source: https://github.com/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/tree/main/skills/ag-revisar-codigo
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude --skill ag-revisar-codigo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviewers often miss design flaws and struggle to scale reviews across large PRs or changesets. This Skill automates a design-focused critique and highlights complexity early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Spawns an ag-revisar-codigo agent to analyze PRs or changesets, focusing on design decisions and architectural implications rather than code style.
  • For PRs with many files, coordinates Agent Teams to perform parallel reviews, improving turnaround on large diffs.
  • Outputs a structured markdown report with findings grouped by severity, including concrete suggestions for design improvements.

Quick Start

To begin a review, invoke the ag-revisar-codigo agent with a PR number or changeset and receive a ready-to-use report.

Frequently Asked Questions about ag-revisar-codigo

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate design-focused code reviews for large PRs and changesets?

Automate design-focused code reviews by spawning a dedicated read-only subagent to analyze PRs, critique architectural decisions, and output a structured markdown report with severity-labeled findings. It coordinates parallel Agent Teams for large diffs exceeding 10 files.

What is the best way to review architectural complexity across multi-file changesets?

Reviewing architectural complexity across multi-file changesets is handled by spawning parallel Agent Teams that perform concurrent reviews. This approach scales turnaround time for large diffs and focuses strictly on design implications rather than code style.

Can I use an automated agent to enforce quality gate checks during PR review?

Automated agents can enforce quality gate checks during PR review by running a read-only workflow that evaluates design decisions and highlights complexity. The agent outputs a structured markdown report grouping findings by severity to support quality enforcement.

How does automated code review handle large diffs with many files?

Automated code review handles large diffs by guiding the use of parallel Agent Teams to perform concurrent analysis on changesets with 10 or more files. This parallel processing improves review turnaround time while maintaining focus on architectural design.

Does automated code review focus on design decisions or code style formatting?

Automated code review focuses specifically on design decisions and architectural implications rather than code style formatting. It critiques structural complexity and highlights design flaws early, outputting concrete suggestions for design improvements in a structured report.

What format does the automated code review report use for severity findings?

The automated code review report uses a structured markdown format that groups findings by severity label. This output includes concrete suggestions for design improvements and is generated by a read-only subagent analyzing the provided PR or changeset.