agent-debate

A multi-agent debate protocol facilitates structured debates to produce an immutable Decision Document before implementing critical changes. It coordinates inputs from security, data, and UX stakeholders to ensure sound, auditable governance.

You document architecture options by drafting problem statements, defining two to three options, and assigning stakeholder roles. This protocol generates an immutable decision record with clear ownership and acceptance criteria for traceability.

Use a structured decision document for critical changes like data model migrations, billing logic, external integrations, and performance-critical paths. It enforces a fixed workflow ensuring auditable review across product teams.

Yes, the debate protocol applies directly to security changes and data model migrations. It enforces a structured workflow with problem statements, agent contributions, and stored decision records for governance and risk analysis.

Initiate a formal debate by drafting a problem statement and triggers, then outline two to three options and assign roles to stakeholders. This generates an immutable decision record with acceptance criteria.

Yes, the decision document generation process supports billing logic and UX flows. It coordinates stakeholder inputs to enforce clear ownership and auditable review across these specific engineering processes.