agent-discussion

Format multi-agent terminal output by applying a structured, boxed layout that organizes specialist findings with agent identifiers, severity badges, and evidence blocks for clear readability.

The best way to structure agent consensus and disagreement in CLI reviews is using a deterministic boxed format that explicitly tags team stance and prioritizes actionable findings.

A boxed terminal layout improves code review debates by rendering each specialist's contribution with metadata, severity tags, and traceable evidence, preventing raw output from becoming unreadable.

Yes, you can use deterministic rendering for multi-agent evaluation audit trails because the boxed format ensures consistent visual structure suitable for EVAL mode and traceability.

Yes, this formatting approach supports evidence blocks for security, accessibility, performance, and code-quality agents, ensuring all findings are traceable and prioritized with severity badges.

You need to use a boxed format for multi-agent debates when multiple specialists contribute findings simultaneously and the raw terminal output becomes too cluttered to parse effectively.