_agent-evaluation-user

Review gobbi agent definitions for usability and trust issues from a user perspective.

Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HahyeonJeon/gobbi --skill agent-evaluation-user
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: _agent-evaluation-user
Source: https://github.com/HahyeonJeon/gobbi/tree/main/plugins/gobbi/skills/_agent-evaluation-user
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HahyeonJeon/gobbi --skill agent-evaluation-user

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams evaluate gobbi agent definitions from the user perspective, surfacing usability issues and trust gaps to improve user experience.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evaluate agent definitions for usability, clarity of scope, and expected user experience.
  • Assess output usefulness, question quality, scope legibility, speed vs. depth, and trust calibration.
  • Provide actionable findings that guide product decisions and design improvements.

Quick Start

Review a given agent definition from a user perspective and identify the top usability and trust concerns, then summarize concrete improvements in a brief report.

Frequently Asked Questions about _agent-evaluation-user

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate AI agent usability from a user perspective?

Evaluating AI agent usability from a user perspective involves reviewing agent definitions to identify clarity of scope, output usefulness, question quality, and trust calibration across typical interactions, ultimately surfacing actionable findings to guide design improvements.

What is trust calibration in AI agents and how do I assess it?

Trust calibration in AI agents is the balance of user confidence in the agent's outputs. You assess it by reviewing agent definitions for consistent guidance and expected user experience, ensuring the agent performs reliably within its defined scope.

How do I identify scope legibility issues in agent definitions?

Identifying scope legibility issues requires reviewing agent definitions to check if the operational boundaries and expected user experience are clear. It assesses whether users can easily understand what the agent can and cannot do.

Can I use this approach to balance speed and depth in agent responses?

Yes, evaluating agent definitions includes assessing the speed-depth balance. It checks whether the agent provides sufficiently detailed answers without excessive latency, ensuring output usefulness during typical user interactions.

What is the best way to review agent definitions for trust gaps?

The best way to review agent definitions for trust gaps is applying a user-facing evaluation skill. It analyzes question quality, scope legibility, and consistent guidance to surface usability issues and provide a brief report of concrete improvements.