agent-grill-me

To stress-test a PRD, you can use a Socratic questioning loop that probes your document for ambiguities, enforces domain vocabulary consistency, and crystallizes final decisions into Architecture Decision Records.

The best way to enforce domain vocabulary during a plan review is by cross-referencing the target artefact against a project domain glossary and bounded context, ensuring all terminology remains consistent throughout the Socratic session.

Yes, you can generate Architecture Decision Records directly from a PRD review by running a live Socratic session that identifies thinking gaps and logs the crystallized decisions into ADRs as the discussion progresses.

A Socratic stress-test for implementation plans works by engaging the document in a live questioning loop, actively uncovering logical gaps and misalignments to ensure coherence before any coding begins.

Yes, providing a domain glossary and bounded context is expected so the review process can actively check the implementation plan against established domain vocabulary and flag inconsistencies.

You should avoid using a Socratic approach for PRD stress-testing if your project lacks a defined domain glossary or bounded context, as the enforcement of domain vocabulary is required to identify ambiguities accurately.