agent-harness-construction

Design agent harnesses for planning, tool-calling, and error recovery.

Updated Mar 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GGEdu/claude-god-mode-template --skill agent-harness-construction-ggedu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agent-harness-construction
Source: https://github.com/GGEdu/claude-god-mode-template/tree/main/skills/agent-harness-construction
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GGEdu/claude-god-mode-template --skill agent-harness-construction-ggedu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Design and optimize how AI agents plan, choose tools, and recover from errors to improve completion rates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Action space design guidelines: use explicit tool names and narrow inputs to ensure deterministic planning.
  • Observation design: require status, summary, next_actions, artifacts in every tool response to enable reliable orchestration.
  • Error recovery and context budgeting: define safe retry, minimal prompts, and budgeted context to sustain long-running tasks.
  • Architecture patterns and benchmarking: guidance for ReAct, function-calling, and hybrid flows; track completion rate and retries.

Quick Start

Initialize a basic agent harness with a minimal set of micro-tools and a simple plan-observe loop.

Frequently Asked Questions about agent-harness-construction

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design an AI agent harness for reliable tool-calling and planning?

Agent harness design uses explicit tool names, narrow inputs, and structured observation schemas with status, summary, next_actions, and artifacts to ensure deterministic planning for reliable orchestration across tool ecosystems.

What is the best way to implement error recovery for AI agents in production pipelines?

Error recovery for AI agents requires defining safe retry contracts, minimal prompts, and context budgeting. This sustains long-running tasks within production pipelines through robust error handling.

How does observation schema design affect agent orchestration?

Observation schema design requires status, summary, next_actions, and artifacts in every tool response. This structured approach enables reliable orchestration by providing the agent harness deterministic feedback for planning.

How do I benchmark AI agent completion rates and retry behavior?

Benchmarking AI agents involves tracking completion rate and retries using built-in hooks. This measures action reliability across architecture patterns like ReAct, function-calling, and hybrid flows.

Can I use context budgeting to sustain long-running agent tasks?

Context budgeting sustains long-running agent tasks by defining minimal prompts and budgeted context limits. This prevents context overflow and maintains reliable planning throughout extended production pipelines.

When should I choose ReAct over function-calling architecture patterns for my agent?

Choosing between ReAct and function-calling architecture patterns depends on your action space design needs. Both support benchmarking hooks, but ReAct suits reasoning loops while function-calling ensures deterministic tool usage.