agent-harness-engineer

Audit and redesign the instruction, memory, tool, and check layer around an AI agent.

Updated Jul 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Cloud-Byte-Consulting/plugins --skill agent-harness-engineer-cloud-byte-consulting
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agent-harness-engineer
Source: https://github.com/Cloud-Byte-Consulting/plugins/tree/main/ai-operations/skills/agent-harness-engineer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Cloud-Byte-Consulting/plugins --skill agent-harness-engineer-cloud-byte-consulting

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Agent harnesses accumulate rules one correction at a time until nobody can see the whole system: duplicated instructions drift, binary requirements get buried in prose, context is re-derived every run, and behavior breaks after model upgrades. This Skill maps, evidence-labels, triages, and rebuilds that harness into an engineered, maintainable system. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Harness mapping and triage: Inventory every instruction file (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, system prompts), skill, memory store, tool schema, and permission, then apply evidence labels and a six-outcome verdict (keep / one-home / load-later / turn-into-check / probation / retire) to each control. - Knowledge layer and handoff design: Draft Retrieval Contract Specs, run retrieval failure triage, and wire multi-agent handoffs using the seven-part task record and receipt vocabulary (AGENT CLAIMED, AGENT BLOCKED, AGENT DONE, etc.). - Experiments and portability: Run 3x3 compact-vs-full instruction experiments, perform SOUL.md elicitation interviews for personal agents, and audit context portability across tools. - Use Case: Your agent ignores rules in a bloated CLAUDE.md after a model upgrade. Use this Skill to map every instruction file, label each rule's evidence status, consolidate duplicates into canonical homes, convert binary requirements into automated checks, and verify the redesign with a 3x3 experiment. ## Quick Start Audit my CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md files, map every instruction and skill, and propose a triaged redesign with numbered, reversible changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about agent-harness-engineer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit a bloated CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md file?

Start with a read-only mapping pass that inventories every instruction file, skill, memory store, and permission, then evidence-label each rule and apply the six-outcome triage: keep, one-home, load-later, turn-into-check, probation, or retire. Changes ship as numbered, reversible proposals.

Why does my agent ignore rules in its instructions file?

Common causes are duplicated rules drifting across files, binary requirements buried in prose, and too much material loaded at startup. The fix is one canonical home per rule, moving yes/no guarantees into validators or hooks, and loading specialist material only at the phase that needs it.

How do I stop my agent from re-deriving context every run?

Design a knowledge layer: define the work object, retrieval unit, authoritative source, permissions, provenance, and precompiled context in a Retrieval Contract Spec before choosing technology. Label all write-back so model guesses never silently become instruction.

Should I use compact or full instruction sets for my agent?

Test both with the 3x3 method: run the same job three times with a compact brief and three times with the full method, score content blind, and check the binary delivery contract separately. Practitioner reports show long context can improve analysis while degrading delivery when enforcement stays in prose.

Can I migrate my agent's skills and memory between AI tools?

Copying a SKILL.md between tools fails because loading behavior, triggers, hooks, and permissions differ. Build a portable work package covering install location, trigger behavior, dependencies, memory scope, and tested harnesses, generated from one markdown source.

When should I not do a full harness redesign?

Low-risk assistants do not need the full knowledge layer, and most sessions do not deserve a new skill. Default to the smaller scope: one canonical rule home and a few prose-to-check conversions beat an unfinished grand redesign.