agent-native-audit

An agent-native architecture audit evaluates your codebase against principles like user capability parity and context management, generating scored reports on compliance to identify architectural strengths and areas for improvement.

You can review codebase compliance by running an audit that concurrently evaluates various architectural principles, such as action parity and tools as primitives, to produce detailed numeric reports indicating your degree of alignment.

Yes, you can run a custom audit on a single specified principle by providing its name, allowing you to focus the software design review on specific areas like context management or data sharing instead of the full architecture.

Yes, the architecture audit concurrently evaluates context management and data sharing alongside user capability parity and tool design, producing scored reports that measure how well your codebase aligns with these agent-native principles.

The best way to measure compliance is to conduct a parallel architecture review that generates detailed numeric reports, quantifying your codebase's degree of alignment with predefined agent-native software design principles.

You should avoid a full architecture audit when you only need to validate a specific software design area, opting instead to run a custom single-principle audit to reduce evaluation scope and focus on targeted code review.