One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sabyunrepo/IaaS --skill agent-output-quality-verification-engine
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Agent Output Quality Verification Engine (품질 검증 엔진)
Source: https://github.com/sabyunrepo/IaaS/tree/main/.claude/skills/quality-engine
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sabyunrepo/IaaS --skill agent-output-quality-verification-engine

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the comprehensive quality verification of Large Language Model (LLM) outputs across an entire pipeline, ensuring accuracy, relevance, and adherence to quality standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Quality Gates: Implements scoring and validation for LLM-generated content at various pipeline phases.
  • Evidence Score: Assigns a score (0-100) to assess the quality and grounding of LLM outputs, with defined actions for different score ranges (PASS, REVISE, REJECT).
  • Multi-dimensional Quality Assessment: Evaluates outputs based on criteria like relevance, clarity, depth, bias, evidence, hallucination, and more.
  • Use Case: Automatically verify the quality of job descriptions, candidate profiles, and interview questions generated by an LLM to ensure they meet predefined standards before proceeding to the next stage.

Quick Start

Use the quality-engine skill to verify the output quality of the LLM for phase P3 questions.

Frequently Asked Questions about Agent Output Quality Verification Engine (품질 검증 엔진)

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate LLM output quality checks in a multi-phase pipeline?

Automate LLM output quality checks by applying structural and LLM-based validation scripts across pipeline phases like P2 analysis and P3 question generation. The engine assesses dimensions like profile completeness, skill accuracy, and evidence grounding to ensure outputs meet predefined standards.

How does automated evidence scoring work for LLM-generated content?

Automated evidence scoring assigns a 0-100 value to assess LLM output grounding and factual correctness. Based on the score, the system applies revision or rejection gates, triggering specific actions like PASS, REVISE, or REJECT for the generated content.

What dimensions should I evaluate to validate LLM-generated interview questions?

To validate LLM-generated interview questions, evaluate dimensions including question relevance, clarity, depth, bias, evidence, and factual correctness. The verification engine checks these criteria against predefined standards before allowing pipeline progression.

Can I integrate Langfuse tracing with an automated quality verification pipeline?

Yes, you can integrate Langfuse tracing with the automated quality verification pipeline. The engine includes integration points for Langfuse tracing and supports potential database storage of quality metrics generated during the validation process.

Do I need Python scripts to set up automated quality gates for LLM outputs?

Yes, Python scripts are required to implement automated quality gates for LLM outputs. These scripts handle structural and LLM-based validation, executing the automated scoring and revision or rejection logic across the pipeline phases.

When should I reject LLM outputs instead of sending them for revision?

You should reject LLM outputs when their evidence score falls into the defined REJECT range, indicating severe grounding or factual correctness failures. Outputs with moderate issues trigger a REVISE action, while high scores pass the quality gate.