agent-readiness

To score task automation suitability, you input a structured task or step-by-step workflow. The Skill measures the coordination-versus-judgment ratio, returning a readiness percentage, matched signals, and a recommendation for deploy-agent, agent-with-oversight, hybrid, or human-led handling.

The coordination-versus-judgment ratio measures how much of a workflow is routing, scheduling, and standardized execution versus ambiguous decision-making. It generates coordination and judgment counts to determine if a task is better suited for an AI agent or requires human-led execution.

You should avoid assigning an AI agent to tasks with high ambiguity and complex decision-making. If workflow analysis reveals a high judgment ratio, the process should be kept human-led or run as a hybrid process with oversight rather than deployed to a fully autonomous agent.

Yes, you can evaluate both single tasks and step-by-step workflows for automation planning. Providing structured step inputs allows the Skill to return coordination and judgment counts, a readiness percentage, and a matched recommendation across the entire process.

The best way to decide is to measure the task's coordination-versus-judgment ratio. If the workflow requires significant oversight due to judgment-heavy steps, a hybrid process or agent-with-oversight is recommended over a fully deployed agent.